George: The referee knew that some moves did not foul in the playoffs. Why should he condone players in the regular season?

Recently, 76ers player Paul George talked about his views on this year's playoff penalty scale in his podcast "Podcast P with Paul George".

Host: "Hey, when it comes to the physical confrontation we see in the playoffs, it has sparked a few people in our league about the 'foul makers'. What do you think about physical confrontation in this year's playoffs? Can you compare it with the regular season? As an ordinary NBA fan, I think this year's playoff referees allow more physical confrontation. I'm curious if you think this situation is not only possible to continue into next year's playoffs, but more importantly to next year's NBA regular season."

George: "I think the key is the consistency of the penalty. Sex, you must be consistent. You see, the question now is: When you know that certain movements in the regular season are not considered fouls, why do you still indulge players in these things? And now in the playoffs, players are allowed to play. So, the key is consistency, right? However, I think this should send a signal: we are going to return to old-style basketball and traditional basketball. We can monitor foul penalty, such as 30 or 40 free throws in a game.

Host: "But we haven't reached the finals yet, and I don't know if the penalty will change in the finals. ”

George: "The confrontation in the finals will definitely be stronger. As a football fan, you don't want the referee to decide the championship. ”